The social scientist in me thought the novel a wonderful counterpoint to a lot of social science that generalizes the past in terms of effects on the present... Arrow of God explores all the nuance and personality that made the past different for each locality and each person. It helps remind you how idiosyncratic and contingent the past was for each place.
Since this week I was teaching Nunn and Wantchekon's paper on the enduring effects of the slave trade in eroding trust, I thought with amusement how their "hypothesis" is utterly absent from the novel.... and while the effects of the "white man" are everywhere traced and felt, one of the deft messages of the novel is to resist understanding the past as having simple effects and stark choices. Everything is messy and happening at the same time, and people involved are alive to all the possibilities, and they negotiate and misunderstand etc.



Leave a comment